Split the taskDécouper la tâche
TRA6008 S3 · in classS3 · en classe
One long request or several steps
Models can increasingly work on one task for a long time, and in some cases that works well. The longer a model works on its own, though, the more room there is for it to drift away from what you want, or to build on its own earlier mistakes (see also the Errors spread through context page, in the LLM lifecycle module) (voir aussi la page Les erreurs se propagent dans le contexte, dans le module Cycle de vie des GML). Splitting a task into separate steps gives you more control: you see how the result was reached, and can correct or redirect along the way.
The same task can be run both ways. In the first conversation below, a single request asks for a bilingual term list. In the second, the same list is built in four exchanges: the terms first, then the sources, then the French equivalents, then the format.
Draft a bilingual term list, US English to Canadian French, of the 20 most relevant terms about AI and large language models, with a French equivalent for each.
Here is a draft list using terminology that should work well in Canadian French, with a preference for terms commonly used in academic and professional contexts in Québec.
| US English | Canadian French |
|---|---|
| artificial intelligence (AI) | intelligence artificielle (IA) |
| generative AI | intelligence artificielle générative (IA générative) |
| large language model (LLM) | grand modèle de langue (GML) |
| language model | modèle de langue |
| foundation model | modèle de fondation |
| machine learning | apprentissage automatique |
| deep learning | apprentissage profond |
| neural network | réseau de neurones |
| transformer | transformeur |
| training | entraînement |
| pretraining | préentraînement |
| fine-tuning | ajustement fin |
| prompt | requête |
| prompt engineering | ingénierie de requêtes |
| token | jeton |
| context window | fenêtre de contexte |
| hallucination | hallucination |
| retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) | génération augmentée par récupération (RAG) |
| reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) | apprentissage par renforcement à partir de rétroaction humaine (RLHF) |
| AI agent | agent d’intelligence artificielle / agent d’IA |
A few entries are worth flagging because usage is not fully settled. GML is a good French equivalent for LLM, although grand modèle de langage is also widespread. For prompt, requête is terminologically cleaner than the very common borrowing prompt, but depending on your audience, invite and instruction also occur. For foundation model, modèle de fondation is established, while modèle de base can be ambiguous. For RAG, génération augmentée par récupération is reasonably transparent, but several competing translations are still in circulation.
What might the 20 most relevant US English terms about AI and large language models be? List the terms only.
artificial intelligence
machine learning
deep learning
neural network
transformer
large language model
generative AI
foundation model
token
tokenization
prompt
prompt engineering
context window
attention
embedding
fine-tuning
retrieval-augmented generation
inference
hallucination
alignment
hm, make it more appropriate for a less technical audience. Perhaps replace transformer and attention.. embedding as well. And do not include both token and tokenization. Suggest alternatives for those.
I would like to look for Canadian French equivalents. Which sources would you suggest for that?
For a less technical audience, I would replace the architecture-level terms with concepts that occur more often in public discussion and everyday use.
For the four you flagged, my preferred substitutions would be:
- transformer → chatbot or AI assistant
- attention → AI agent
- embedding → training data
- tokenization → drop it and retain token only
Other good candidates, depending on what you want the glossary to cover, are multimodal AI, AI-generated content, synthetic data, AI bias, AI safety, AI system, and natural language processing.
So I might revise the 20 to:
artificial intelligence
machine learning
deep learning
neural network
generative AI
foundation model
large language model
AI model
chatbot
AI assistant
AI agent
prompt
prompt engineering
context window
token
training data
fine-tuning
retrieval-augmented generation
hallucination
alignment
I would consider neural network, deep learning, fine-tuning, and retrieval-augmented generation the remaining relatively technical items. If the intended readership is genuinely general-public rather than “non-specialists who work with AI”, I would probably replace some of those too.
For Canadian French equivalents
I would use three sources, in roughly this order:
- OQLF, Grand dictionnaire terminologique / Vitrine linguistique. This is probably your best primary source if you specifically want Québec/Canadian French. The OQLF has an actively maintained AI vocabulary, L’intelligence artificielle en évolution : les termes de l’IA. Its entries distinguish termes privilégiés, acceptable variants, abbreviations, usage notes, and definitions. For example, it currently gives grand modèle de langage for large language model and jeton for token. [Vitrine linguistique +1]
- TERMIUM Plus, from the federal Translation Bureau. This is the other source I would systematically check. It is explicitly Canadian, bilingual, and its AI records have been updated quite aggressively in 2025–2026. For instance, its current token record gives jeton / jeton textuel, and it has dedicated recent records for generative-AI terminology. [Termium Plus +2]
- Translation Bureau’s Artificial Intelligence Terminology Concept Map. This is particularly handy for your task because it is already a curated English–French AI term list rather than a general terminological database. It includes things such as artificial intelligence → intelligence artificielle, generative AI → IA générative, deep learning → apprentissage profond, prompt engineering, and retrieval-augmented generation, with links into TERMIUM. The Bureau explicitly says its terminologists continually update TERMIUM as AI terminology evolves. [Our Languages]
For this particular glossary, I would cross-check every term in both OQLF and TERMIUM. Where they agree, the choice is easy. Where they differ, that difference is itself useful information: OQLF tends to tell you what is preferred in Québec, whereas TERMIUM tells you what the federal Translation Bureau recognizes in Canadian government usage.
I would use FranceTerme only as a secondary comparison source, not as the basis for a Canadian French glossary. The OQLF sometimes imports FranceTerme records alongside its own, so it is important to look at the author of the individual GDT record, not merely assume that anything appearing in the GDT is an OQLF recommendation. For example, there are separate OQLF and FranceTerme records for grand modèle de langage. [Vitrine linguistique +1]
If the goal is a 20-term US English → Canadian French terminology list, OQLF + TERMIUM is a very defensible methodology.
Agreed with added terms and cross-checking OQLF + Termium. In case of disagreement, use DataFranca as a tiebreaker.
That gives a clear hierarchy:
- OQLF
- TERMIUM Plus
- DataFranca as tiebreaker when OQLF and TERMIUM disagree
For each term, I’d record the preferred Canadian French equivalent, and only flag alternatives where there is a meaningful terminological difference rather than harmless variation.
Ok, give me final list in a format I can copy-paste into excel
I replaced AI assistant with multimodal AI, which is both more useful conceptually and has a clear OQLF/TERMIUM equivalent. The forms below prioritize OQLF, with TERMIUM cross-checking; for example, both support requête, jeton, affinage, fenêtre de contexte, and grand modèle de langage. [Vitrine linguistique +4]
Copy-paste this directly into Excel:
US English Canadian French
artificial intelligence intelligence artificielle
machine learning apprentissage automatique
deep learning apprentissage profond
neural network réseau de neurones artificiels
generative AI intelligence artificielle générative
foundation model modèle de fondation
large language model grand modèle de langage
AI model modèle d'intelligence artificielle
chatbot robot conversationnel
multimodal AI intelligence artificielle multimodale
AI agent agent d'intelligence artificielle
prompt requête
prompt engineering rédactique
context window fenêtre de contexte
token jeton
training data données d'entraînement
fine-tuning affinage
retrieval-augmented generation génération augmentée par récupération
hallucination hallucination d'IA
AI alignment alignement de l'IATwo choices worth flagging: rédactique is specifically the OQLF-preferred term for prompt engineering, although TERMIUM and DataFranca also recognize ingénierie de requêtes. [Vitrine linguistique +2] For retrieval-augmented generation, OQLF prefers génération augmentée par récupération, whereas TERMIUM proposes génération améliorée par récupération d’information (GARI) but also records the OQLF form; I therefore kept the OQLF form. [Vitrine linguistique +1]
Both conversations end in a usable list. The one done in steps took longer, but it gave:
- more insight: you see which terms the model picks, and which sources it would rely on, before any French is proposed;
- more control: the list was adapted to a less technical audience, and the order of the sources was set by the person doing the work;
- perhaps more inspiration: engaged with each step, you are more likely to think of a term or a source yourself;
- perhaps fewer wasted tokens: a correction made to the list of terms costs one short exchange, where a correction to a finished table means generating the table again.
The French differs as well. Asked from memory, the model gave ajustement fin for fine-tuning; asked to follow the OQLF and TERMIUM, it gave affinage, the term both banks record. The steps also show where the model drifts: in its last answer, it replaced AI assistant with multimodal AI on its own, and said so.
Working in steps also shows you which step the model handles well and which it does not. The step it gets wrong is the one to do yourself, or to support with more material.
Working step by step
Asking a model to work through a problem before answering helps mainly on mathematics and other tasks worked out by rule (see also the Reasoning step by step page, in the LLM lifecycle module) (voir aussi la page Raisonner étape par étape, dans le module Cycle de vie des GML). A model set to reason before answering already does this, so on such a model the request adds little and costs time (Meincke et al., 2025b). With reasoning switched off or set low, it can still help on a calculation or a rule applied case by case (see also the Execution “effort” page) (voir aussi la page L'« effort » d'exécution).
Une seule longue demande ou plusieurs étapes
Les modèles peuvent de plus en plus travailler longtemps sur une même tâche, et dans certains cas, cela donne de bons résultats. Mais plus un modèle travaille seul longtemps, plus il risque de s’éloigner de ce que vous voulez, ou de bâtir sur ses propres erreurs antérieures (see also the Errors spread through context page, in the LLM lifecycle module) (voir aussi la page Les erreurs se propagent dans le contexte, dans le module Cycle de vie des GML). Découper une tâche en étapes distinctes vous donne plus de maîtrise : vous voyez comment le résultat a été obtenu, et vous pouvez corriger ou réorienter en cours de route.
La même tâche peut être menée des deux façons. Dans la première conversation ci-dessous, une seule demande porte sur une liste de termes bilingue. Dans la seconde, la même liste est construite en quatre échanges : d’abord les termes, puis les sources, puis les équivalents français, puis le format.
Draft a bilingual term list, US English to Canadian French, of the 20 most relevant terms about AI and large language models, with a French equivalent for each.
Here is a draft list using terminology that should work well in Canadian French, with a preference for terms commonly used in academic and professional contexts in Québec.
| US English | Canadian French |
|---|---|
| artificial intelligence (AI) | intelligence artificielle (IA) |
| generative AI | intelligence artificielle générative (IA générative) |
| large language model (LLM) | grand modèle de langue (GML) |
| language model | modèle de langue |
| foundation model | modèle de fondation |
| machine learning | apprentissage automatique |
| deep learning | apprentissage profond |
| neural network | réseau de neurones |
| transformer | transformeur |
| training | entraînement |
| pretraining | préentraînement |
| fine-tuning | ajustement fin |
| prompt | requête |
| prompt engineering | ingénierie de requêtes |
| token | jeton |
| context window | fenêtre de contexte |
| hallucination | hallucination |
| retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) | génération augmentée par récupération (RAG) |
| reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) | apprentissage par renforcement à partir de rétroaction humaine (RLHF) |
| AI agent | agent d’intelligence artificielle / agent d’IA |
A few entries are worth flagging because usage is not fully settled. GML is a good French equivalent for LLM, although grand modèle de langage is also widespread. For prompt, requête is terminologically cleaner than the very common borrowing prompt, but depending on your audience, invite and instruction also occur. For foundation model, modèle de fondation is established, while modèle de base can be ambiguous. For RAG, génération augmentée par récupération is reasonably transparent, but several competing translations are still in circulation.
What might the 20 most relevant US English terms about AI and large language models be? List the terms only.
artificial intelligence
machine learning
deep learning
neural network
transformer
large language model
generative AI
foundation model
token
tokenization
prompt
prompt engineering
context window
attention
embedding
fine-tuning
retrieval-augmented generation
inference
hallucination
alignment
hm, make it more appropriate for a less technical audience. Perhaps replace transformer and attention.. embedding as well. And do not include both token and tokenization. Suggest alternatives for those.
I would like to look for Canadian French equivalents. Which sources would you suggest for that?
For a less technical audience, I would replace the architecture-level terms with concepts that occur more often in public discussion and everyday use.
For the four you flagged, my preferred substitutions would be:
- transformer → chatbot or AI assistant
- attention → AI agent
- embedding → training data
- tokenization → drop it and retain token only
Other good candidates, depending on what you want the glossary to cover, are multimodal AI, AI-generated content, synthetic data, AI bias, AI safety, AI system, and natural language processing.
So I might revise the 20 to:
artificial intelligence
machine learning
deep learning
neural network
generative AI
foundation model
large language model
AI model
chatbot
AI assistant
AI agent
prompt
prompt engineering
context window
token
training data
fine-tuning
retrieval-augmented generation
hallucination
alignment
I would consider neural network, deep learning, fine-tuning, and retrieval-augmented generation the remaining relatively technical items. If the intended readership is genuinely general-public rather than “non-specialists who work with AI”, I would probably replace some of those too.
For Canadian French equivalents
I would use three sources, in roughly this order:
- OQLF, Grand dictionnaire terminologique / Vitrine linguistique. This is probably your best primary source if you specifically want Québec/Canadian French. The OQLF has an actively maintained AI vocabulary, L’intelligence artificielle en évolution : les termes de l’IA. Its entries distinguish termes privilégiés, acceptable variants, abbreviations, usage notes, and definitions. For example, it currently gives grand modèle de langage for large language model and jeton for token. [Vitrine linguistique +1]
- TERMIUM Plus, from the federal Translation Bureau. This is the other source I would systematically check. It is explicitly Canadian, bilingual, and its AI records have been updated quite aggressively in 2025–2026. For instance, its current token record gives jeton / jeton textuel, and it has dedicated recent records for generative-AI terminology. [Termium Plus +2]
- Translation Bureau’s Artificial Intelligence Terminology Concept Map. This is particularly handy for your task because it is already a curated English–French AI term list rather than a general terminological database. It includes things such as artificial intelligence → intelligence artificielle, generative AI → IA générative, deep learning → apprentissage profond, prompt engineering, and retrieval-augmented generation, with links into TERMIUM. The Bureau explicitly says its terminologists continually update TERMIUM as AI terminology evolves. [Our Languages]
For this particular glossary, I would cross-check every term in both OQLF and TERMIUM. Where they agree, the choice is easy. Where they differ, that difference is itself useful information: OQLF tends to tell you what is preferred in Québec, whereas TERMIUM tells you what the federal Translation Bureau recognizes in Canadian government usage.
I would use FranceTerme only as a secondary comparison source, not as the basis for a Canadian French glossary. The OQLF sometimes imports FranceTerme records alongside its own, so it is important to look at the author of the individual GDT record, not merely assume that anything appearing in the GDT is an OQLF recommendation. For example, there are separate OQLF and FranceTerme records for grand modèle de langage. [Vitrine linguistique +1]
If the goal is a 20-term US English → Canadian French terminology list, OQLF + TERMIUM is a very defensible methodology.
Agreed with added terms and cross-checking OQLF + Termium. In case of disagreement, use DataFranca as a tiebreaker.
That gives a clear hierarchy:
- OQLF
- TERMIUM Plus
- DataFranca as tiebreaker when OQLF and TERMIUM disagree
For each term, I’d record the preferred Canadian French equivalent, and only flag alternatives where there is a meaningful terminological difference rather than harmless variation.
Ok, give me final list in a format I can copy-paste into excel
I replaced AI assistant with multimodal AI, which is both more useful conceptually and has a clear OQLF/TERMIUM equivalent. The forms below prioritize OQLF, with TERMIUM cross-checking; for example, both support requête, jeton, affinage, fenêtre de contexte, and grand modèle de langage. [Vitrine linguistique +4]
Copy-paste this directly into Excel:
US English Canadian French
artificial intelligence intelligence artificielle
machine learning apprentissage automatique
deep learning apprentissage profond
neural network réseau de neurones artificiels
generative AI intelligence artificielle générative
foundation model modèle de fondation
large language model grand modèle de langage
AI model modèle d'intelligence artificielle
chatbot robot conversationnel
multimodal AI intelligence artificielle multimodale
AI agent agent d'intelligence artificielle
prompt requête
prompt engineering rédactique
context window fenêtre de contexte
token jeton
training data données d'entraînement
fine-tuning affinage
retrieval-augmented generation génération augmentée par récupération
hallucination hallucination d'IA
AI alignment alignement de l'IATwo choices worth flagging: rédactique is specifically the OQLF-preferred term for prompt engineering, although TERMIUM and DataFranca also recognize ingénierie de requêtes. [Vitrine linguistique +2] For retrieval-augmented generation, OQLF prefers génération augmentée par récupération, whereas TERMIUM proposes génération améliorée par récupération d’information (GARI) but also records the OQLF form; I therefore kept the OQLF form. [Vitrine linguistique +1]
Les deux conversations aboutissent à une liste utilisable. Celle qui procède par étapes a pris plus de temps, mais elle a donné :
- une meilleure vue d’ensemble : vous voyez quels termes le modèle choisit, et sur quelles sources il s’appuierait, avant qu’il propose le moindre équivalent français ;
- plus de maîtrise : la liste a été adaptée à un public moins technique, et l’ordre des sources a été fixé par la personne qui fait le travail ;
- peut-être plus d’inspiration : en suivant chaque étape, vous avez plus de chances de penser vous-même à un terme ou à une source ;
- peut-être moins de jetons gaspillés : corriger la liste de termes coûte un court échange, alors que corriger un tableau terminé oblige à le générer de nouveau.
Le français diffère aussi. Interrogé de mémoire, le modèle a donné « ajustement fin » pour fine-tuning ; invité à suivre l’OQLF et TERMIUM, il a donné « affinage », le terme que consignent les deux banques. Les étapes montrent aussi où le modèle dérive : dans sa dernière réponse, il a remplacé AI assistant par multimodal AI de lui-même, en le signalant.
Travailler par étapes vous montre aussi quelle étape le modèle réussit et laquelle il rate. L’étape qu’il rate est celle à faire vous-même, ou à appuyer sur davantage de documentation.
Travailler étape par étape
Demander à un modèle de résoudre un problème pas à pas avant de répondre aide surtout en mathématiques et dans les autres tâches qui se résolvent en appliquant des règles (see also the Reasoning step by step page, in the LLM lifecycle module) (voir aussi la page Raisonner étape par étape, dans le module Cycle de vie des GML). Un modèle réglé pour raisonner avant de répondre le fait déjà : sur un tel modèle, la demande apporte peu et prend du temps (Meincke et al., 2025b). Avec le raisonnement désactivé ou réglé bas, elle peut encore aider pour un calcul ou pour une règle appliquée cas par cas (see also the Execution “effort” page) (voir aussi la page L'« effort » d'exécution).
Sources
- Meincke, L., Mollick, E. R., Mollick, L., & Shapiro, D. (2025b). Prompting Science Report 2: The Decreasing Value of Chain of Thought in Prompting. Wharton Generative AI Labs, technical report; preprint, arXiv:2506.07142. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.07142
Sources
- Meincke, L., Mollick, E. R., Mollick, L., & Shapiro, D. (2025b). Prompting Science Report 2: The Decreasing Value of Chain of Thought in Prompting. Wharton Generative AI Labs, technical report; preprint, arXiv:2506.07142. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.07142